[-empyre-] Re: copyright
"New media" or not, artists "traditionally" have been
robbed-blind by art institutions -- it may be more pertinent
to first insure that artists/heirs are compensated for the
increased monetary value of exhibited/collected works.
Copyright laws would seem to have minimal monetary affect in
this regard, and would likely curtail any contemporary
distribution methods that run-around restrictive,
hierarchical, regressive institutional structures still
standing.
The 12hr-ISBN-JPEG Project >>>> since 1994 <<<<
+ + + serial ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/b/bbrace
+ + + eccentric ftp://ftp.idiom.com/users/bbrace
+ + + continuous hotline://artlyin.ftr.va.com.au
+ + + hypermodern ftp://ftp.rdrop.com/pub/users/bbrace
+ + + imagery ftp://ftp.pacifier.com/pub/users/bbrace
News: alt.binaries.pictures.12hr alt.binaries.pictures.misc
alt.binaries.pictures.fine-art.misc alt.12hr
12hr email
subscriptions => http://bbrace.laughingsquid.net/buy-into.html
Other | Mirror: http://www.eskimo.com/~bbrace/bbrace.html
Projects | Reverse Solidus: http://bbrace.laughingsquid.net/
{ brad brace } <<<<< bbrace@eskimo.com >>>> ~finger for pgp
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.